ID more and more dirty

Not only creationists but politician also leave IDers
The Senator, who is seeking re-election, has been backpedaling away from his support of the ID ever since the Dover Area School District deep-sixed its unconstitutional intelligent design policy.
via

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »

farewell

I’ve decided to put Uncommon Descent into mothballs indefinitely. William Dembski need to concentrate forces…And he leaves the stage at post 609, quite symmetric! On artistic or intelligent design?

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »

Intelligent Design attacks

We received a long email that said a lot of nasty things, but here is a quote from it to give you an idea of the content:
“You blasphemers are spreading the false scripiture (sic) of evolution, trying to make people think its okay to merge human DNA with animal DNA. Humans are not animals! It [...]

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »

make your choice

Cartoon, by Doonesbury. Some times having to make a choice make you think twice about your beliefs

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »

desperately seeking evidence

A short text signed Brian W. Ogilvie, titled “Why the Court’s Dover Decision Is a Triumph for Religion as well as Science“, interesting to read.
Creationists seem to give-up the collaboration with Intelligent Design, as William Dembski mentionned. You don’t want to be seen with a looser.
But there is more in that and Brian W. Ogilvie [...]

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »

breacktrhough

I’m discovering William Dembski, as a quite naive guy in fact. He wonders :
In what other science do its scientists have to do so much cheerleading for their theory?
None! Biology concern us in many ways and advancements have deep and almost immediate impacts in our lives, so it’s worth some celebration, not only from its [...]

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »

ID dirty for creationists?

Aha ! News at the horizon.
William Dembski wonders what’s up to Reasons to Believe. The response is :
“At Reasons To Believe, our team of scientists has developed a theory for creation that embraces the latest scientific advances. It is fully testable, falsifiable, and successfully predicts the current discoveries in origin of life research.” via
Seems that [...]

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »

commenting/tagging

While the discussion with Fulcanelli is over, there are a lot of IDers out there talking non sense. So, this blog is open again for the simple reason that IDers and/or other cretionist don’t seem to like comments on their blogs.
William Dembski want productive comments on his blog. He don’t say if the should be [...]

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »

Paul Nelson on private vs public schools

This is a response to Paul Nelson’s question. As the Intelligent Design for the future blog-like site can’t afford comments of trackbacks, it will go thought Technorati tags.
I have attend a private school and have learn creationism as the main (and only) explanation of the world. That didn’t made of me a creationist ! I [...]

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »

overwhelming evidence

“The overwhelming evidence at trial established that ID is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism, and not a scientific theory.”
Judge John E. Jones III via
Peut-être que Fulcanelli pourra montrer le contraire, j’attends toujours un descriptif des son hypothèse d’ailleurs.
Comme le dit le même juge,
With that said, we do not question that many of [...]

Lire l'intégralité de l'article »